[Nhiều nguồn] Intel lại dính chưởng

Spoiler

Yet Another Speculative Malfunction: Intel Reveals New Side-Channel Attack, Advises Disabling Hyper-Threading Below 8th, 9th Gen CPUs
Updated by Raevenlord Today, 01:57 Discuss (59 Comments)
Ouch doesn't even begin to describe how much that headline hurt. As far as speculative execution goes, it's been well covered by now, but here's a refresher. Speculative execution essentially means that your CPU tries to think ahead of time on what data may or may not be needed, and processes it before it knows it's needed. The objective is to take advantage of concurrency in the CPU design, keeping processing units that would otherwise be left idle to process and deliver results on the off-chance that they are indeed required by the system: and when they are called for, the CPU saves time by not having to process them on the fly and already having them available.

The flaws have been announced by Intel in coordination with Austrian university TU Graz, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the University of Michigan, the University of Adelaide, KU Leuven in Belgium, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Saarland University in Germany and security firms Cyberus, BitDefender, Qihoo360 and Oracle. While some of the parties involved have named the four identified flaws with names such as "ZombieLoad", "Fallout", and RIDL, or "Rogue In-Flight Data Load", Intel is using the PEGI-13 "Microarchitectural Data Sampling (MDS)" name.

Update May 15th: Intel has released benchmarks that show the performance impact of the MDS mitigations.

The issue at hand here, defined by Intel's pretty tame MDS, is that like other side-channel attacks, exploits may allow hackers to obtain information that was otherwise deemed secure, had it not been run through the CPU's speculative execution processes. While Meltdown read sensitive information that was being stored in memory due to the speculative execution functions on Intel's CPUs, MDS attacks read the data on the CPU's various buffers - between threads, along the way to the CPU cache, and others. The researchers say that this flaw can be used to siphon data from the CPU at a rate that can approach real-time, and can be used to selectively pull what information is deemed important: whether it's passwords or what websites the user is visiting at the moment of the attack, it's all fair game.


Intel says that significant software changes will be needed to harden systems against this exploit, not only from themselves, but from operating system vendors and third party app creators. One of the proposed solutions is that every time a processor would switch from one third-party app to another, from a Windows process to a third-party app, or even from less trusted Windows processes to more trusted ones, the buffers have to be cleared or overwritten. This means a whole new cycle of data gathering and writing beings every time you call up a different process - and you bet that carries a performance penalty, which Intel is putting at a "minimal" up to 9%.

Intel detailed the vulnerability in its whitepaper and admitted that disabling HT might be warranted as a protection against MDS attacks - and you can imagine how much the company must have loathed to publish such a thing. Intel's HT has been heavily hit by repeated speculative execution flaws found on Intel processors, with mitigations usually costing some sort of performance on Intel's concurrent processing technology. Intel says its engineers discovered the MDS vulnerabilities last year, and that it has now released fixes for the flaw in both hardware and software. Although obviously, the software fixes will have to be deployed either on microcode updates or will have to be implemented by every operating system, virtualization vendor, and other software makers.

Intel also said that its 8th and 9th generation processors already include the hardware mitigations that defeat the exploitation of MDS, but previous architectures back to Nehalem are vulnerable. But why play it on expectations: you can take a test that has been published by the researchers right here.

The CVE codes for the vulnerabilities stand as such:

• CVE-2018-12126 Microarchitectural Store Buffer Data Sampling (MSBDS)
• CVE-2018-12130 Microarchitectural Fill Buffer Data Sampling (MFBDS)
• CVE-2018-12127 Microarchitectural Load Port Data Sampling (MLPDS)
• CVE-2019-11091 Microarchitectural Data Sampling Uncacheable Memory (MDSUM)

Túm tắt:

• Intel lại dính exploit mới liên quan tới HyperThreading
• Exploit cực dễ replicate nhưng ảnh hưởng khá nghiêm trọng
  
• Exploit ảnh hưởng đến tất cả cả dòng chip từ 2008 đến hiện nay, riêng từ Coffee-Lake trở lên an toàn hơn nhưng vẫn ít nhiều bị ảnh hưởng
• Intel cho rằng lỗi có thể fix bằng patch, sau khi patch hiệu năng sẽ giảm tối đa 8-9% cho các dòng chip trước Coffee-Lake, 9900K sau khi patch cũng giảm tầm 2% hiệu năng
• Bên nghiên cứu cho rằng cách tốt nhất hiện giờ là tắt HyperThreading, tương ứng với việc giảm tối đa 20%-40% (mỗi nguồn nói 1 kiểu) hiệu năng các dòng chip trước đây
• Intel bảo không cần tắt HyperThreading và có tắt thì cũng chỉ giảm 8-9% hiệu năng nhưng chỉ cho ví dụ benchmark duy nhất với con 9900K (https://www.techpowerup.com/255534/...-minimal-performance-impact-of-mds-mitigation)
• Google đã tắt HyperThreading của Intel trong ChromeOS
• Các exploit này liên quan đến kiến trúc của Intel, chip của AMD và các chip ARM ko bị ảnh hưởng

Trivia:

• Nhóm nghiên cứu vốn được thưởng $40k (lỗi vặt), sau khi dọa sẽ ngừng hợp tác tìm bug cho Intel mới được tăng lên $100k (lỗi nghiêm trọng)
• Có thể tìm các bài liên quan với từ khóa: ZombieLoad, RIDL attacks, Fallout attacks, MDS-class vulnerabilities

https://www.wired.com/story/intel-mds-attack-speculative-execution-buffer/

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ld-slow-some-chips-by-nearly-20-idUSKCN1SK2OD

https://www.techpowerup.com/255534/...-minimal-performance-impact-of-mds-mitigation

https://mdsattacks.com/

Bác nào gần đây chơi game cứ giật giật thì biết vì sao rồi nhé

 

Giờ chơi mỗi lmht để giải trí đéo quan tâm lắm..........

 

Seeder AMD rõ rành kia kìa

 

mấy hôm trước giật thật, còn chửi bọn làm game lag thêm hoá ra chửi nhầm

 

may quá xài ryzen 7

 

Hèn chi mấy nay coi pỏnhub cứ giật giật, địp mịa in teo

 

Ủa thế cái lỗi đó nó làm gì mà khiến chơi game bị giật

 

chơi dota 2 lúc load map được lúc không, không biết do HDD cùi hay chíp cùi nữa :(

 

Hèn chi con laptop Lenovo của mình VGA 920M chạy Crysis high setting cứ giật giật.

 

mua 2700 thật là đúng đắn

 

giờ có tiền làm giàng AMD cho chắc ăn nó suppor main chip lâu dài. còn bọn intel ra chíp mới phải mua main mới thì chịu

 

Lỗi ko làm giảm hiệu năng nhưng patch fix lỗi làm giảm hiệu năng, mà lỗi này nghiêm trọng nên Intel ko lờ đi được.

 

thảo nào , dcm đời

 

2600x, ko quan tâmmmmmm

 

Hèn gì mấy bữa nay lên xvid xem nó cứ giật giật, cứ tưởng diễn viên đóng hăng quá

 

Đệch bảo sao 1080ti mà chơi Aoe vẫn giật

 

Dm bảo sao mấy hôm nay toàn mất highscore pikachu

 

Mới cài patch fix lỗi hôm qua

 

Hên xài win 7 tắt autoupdate

 

Đm thảo nào mấy hôm nay wifi cứ chập chờn trên con lap, hoá ra do thằng inteo